Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

How to Modernize Your School Without Security Gaps

Schools need better tools, but every new platform, vendor, device, or portal adds something to manage. A grading tool, facilities upgrade, payment system, or classroom app may solve one problem while creating another. The goal is not to avoid modernization. It is to modernize with a clear view of data, access, and vendor risk.

Practical Cybersecurity for Small Water Utilities: 5 Steps to Reduce Operational Risk

SpiderLabs’ technical review of the July attacks examines the affected technologies, observed activity, and broader threat landscape. The next question is practical: what can small utilities realistically do about it? At many small water and wastewater facilities, there is often no dedicated security team to understaff. A licensed operator may be responsible for sampling, maintenance, compliance, and after-hours callouts, perhaps with limited support from municipal IT.

What's New in Risk Automations: 4 Templates for Vendor and User Risk

Most vendor onboarding and app access work is waiting and follow-ups. Waiting for someone to notice a form came in, assign a tier, chase a questionnaire, or dig up the context behind a Slack request. Risk Automations workflows remove that wait and automate the follow-up. A trigger fires, and the workflow runs to a concrete outcome: a ticket created, a message sent, a risk tier assigned. To make those workflows easier to launch, Risk Automations includes an ever-expanding template library.

DORA, NIS2 and the Four-Hour Clock Reshaping GRC

A GRC program that produces documents quarterly cannot file a regulatory notification in four hours. The sentence carries the whole modernization argument, and the four-hour figure is not rhetorical. Under DORA, an EU financial entity classifying an incident as major has four hours to send an initial notification, then twenty-four hours for an initial report, seventy-two for an intermediate one and a month for the final. ‍

Reporting AI Risk to the Board: What Directors Want to See

Directors ask for AI risk reporting because oversight failure is personally actionable. Under the Caremark line of cases, a board that cannot demonstrate it monitored a material risk carries exposure of its own, and AI has moved into that category for most enterprises. The request is rarely curiosity about the technology. ‍ The framing determines what belongs in the pack.

NIST AI RMF vs ISO 42001: Choosing Your AI Governance Framework

NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 answer different questions, so the choice is rarely about which one is better. One gives you a risk process your engineering teams can run. The other gives you a management system an auditor can certify. Organizations that treat them as rival options usually pick the wrong one for the problem in front of them. ‍

The Invisible Expansion of the Attack Surface: Shadow AI, MCP, and Third-Party Risk

AI adoption is moving faster than most of us anticipated and, more importantly, faster than most organizations can govern it. Organizations are implementing the use of AI-enabled applications, browser extensions, coding assistants, and automated agents to enable employees to work faster. In many cases, these tools are adopted without security review, procurement approval, or a clear understanding of where organizational data is being sent.

TITAN AI Demo Series: Automatically Build Custom Monitoring Rules

Manually configuring monitoring rules for every vendor category can be time consuming. TITAN Watch's Rule Builder Agent lets your team define monitoring logic in plain language, then automatically builds and applies the rules across your vendor ecosystem. No manual configuration, no rigid rule templates. In Episode 10 of SecurityScorecard's Demo Tuesday series, see the Rule Builder Agent in action.

Manage internal and external risk all from Vanta

Between audits, most GRC teams are managing risk with one eye closed. Vanta gives you the whole view: internal and third-party risk in one connected system, monitored continuously, not once a year. Vanta's Third-Party Risk Management discovers new vendors, cuts assessment time by 50%, and watches your vendor landscape for breaches and emerging threats. Vanta's Risk Management runs your full enterprise program: risk register, likelihood and impact scoring, residual risk, treatment plans, and board-ready reporting.

Supply chain risk management: What it is and why enterprises need it

Accelerating security solutions for small businesses‍ Tagore offers strategic services to small businesses. A partnership that can scale‍ Tagore prioritized finding a managed compliance partner with an established product, dedicated support team, and rapid release rate. Standing out from competitors‍ Tagore's partnership with Vanta enhances its strategic focus and deepens client value, creating differentiation in a competitive market.