Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Why Most Incident Response Retainers Fail When It Matters Most

Many companies have an incident response retainer...but it doesn't actually make them risk ready. That's because too many retainers are built on outdated, hour-based "use it or lose it" models that don't actually reduce risk, improve resilience, or focus on outcomes. A modern retainer should drive preparedness, align with today's insurance realities, and actively lower exposure before an incident happens.

Incident Response Retainers Are Now Foundational to Cyber Resilience

LevelBlue has been named a Representative Service Provider in the Gartner Market Guide for Cybersecurity Incident Response Retainer Services (CIRR), marking the fifth consecutive time the company has been included in the report. We believe this continued recognition reflects LevelBlue’s ongoing focus on supporting organizations across the full lifecycle of incident readiness, response, and recovery.

How Cyber Resilience Supports Long-Term Security Goals

In recent years, cyber resilience has moved from being an option to a huge necessity. With organizations becoming a constant target for digital threats, the need for protection, prevention, and deterrence strategies has become more pertinent than ever. Resilience is about being prepared for disruptions, responding quickly, and recovering thoroughly. This makes it easy to secure information and builds faith in the long run.

Solving Four Common Incident Response Mistakes That Delay Containment and Drive Up Costs

Organizations often lose precious hours and sometimes millions of dollars because they lack a well-defined and tested incident response plan. In many cases, response roles are loosely defined and disconnected from key stakeholders, including digital forensics teams, breach counsel, and cyber insurance providers. Even large organizations fall into this trap, resulting in delayed containment, inefficient recovery, and prolonged business interruption.

The Exploit Window Collapse: Claude Mythos and the Future of Incident Response

Every so often, something comes along that forces you to recalibrate how you think about cyber risk. Not incrementally, but fundamentally. Claude Mythos feels like one of those moments. The cybersecurity industry has spent decades racing attackers to close vulnerabilities faster. Claude Mythos suggests that race may be entering an entirely new phase. One where speed itself becomes the defining risk factor.

Proven incident response and business continuity strategy

From cybersecurity breaches to natural disasters, disruptive events can occur suddenly and without warning. As a result, it is crucial for organizations to develop resilient plans that not only respond to incidents in real time but also ensure long-term operational survivability. This article examines the concepts of incident response and business continuity, exploring their differences and similarities while offering practical strategies to integrate them into a cohesive operational plan.

Why Incident Response Fails (And It's Not the Technology)

Incident response plans rarely fail because of technology. It’s usually because of coordination, or the lack of. Nelson Carreira explains why organizations that build isolated recovery environments should use them not only for recovery testing but also to strengthen incident response planning. Simulation exercises reveal a critical need: clear roles, leadership authority, and secure communication channels during a crisis.

Incident responders, s'il vous plait: Invites lead to odd malware events

A phishing campaign targeting multiple organizations led to RMM installations – but not much else (yet). A threat actor experimenting, or an access-as-a-service attack underway? Sophos’ Managed Detection and Response (MDR) teams reported on a phishing campaign late last year that attempted to trick users into installing LogMeIn Resolve (formerly GoToResolve), a remote monitoring and management (RMM) tool, to acquire remote unattended access.