Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

For most organizations, answering these questions is slow, manual, and difficult to defend. Analysts must interpret threat reports, build SIEM queries, run retroactive searches, and validate findings under pressure. The result is delayed answers, inconsistent processes, and limited confidence at the executive level. This is the gap between threat awareness and proof of exposure. It is where operational risk and board-level scrutiny converge.

See how Torq harnesses AI in your SOC to detect, prioritize, and respond to threats faster. Request a Demo 92% of security leaders say something is actively reducing their trust in AI within the SOC. These aren’t skeptics, they’re people who have already adopted AI and believe in its ability to enhance security operations. We know from the 2026 AI SOC Leadership Report that AI is already widely adopted in the SOC, with 94% of organizations using it in some capacity.

“ AI has fundamentally changed the pace of security operations. Attackers are using automation to scale faster than most internal teams can realistically respond.“

As cyber threats continue to grow and become more threatening, it’s important for businesses to implement robust cybersecurity measures. SOC Support Consulting is becoming increasingly important for improving cybersecurity because it equips companies with the knowledge and tools to quickly identify and stop threats. According to Vectra AI, businesses leveraging SOCaaS are likely to detect threats 96% faster compared to those with an in-house SOC.

Many security functions today still rely heavily on humans for detection, triage, and response, often by design. But as environments grow more complex and alert volumes explode, it raises a hard question: Can this approach scale on its own? Adopting AI in security operations isn’t just about adding tools. It means rethinking the SOC operating model itself — roles, workflows, and team structures. Here’s why, and how.

Every security vendor shipping an AI product in 2026 makes the same promises. Faster triage. Shorter response times. Fewer false positives. Reclaimed analyst hours. But, six months after deployment, most security leaders still cannot answer a straightforward question from the board: Is this thing actually working?

A credential access event fired. An AI agent investigated it, correlated it against running processes, assessed the risk, and closed the ticket. No analyst touched it. The entire loop ran in minutes. This is what security operations look like when AI can actually operate in the environment rather than advise from outside it. Security operations have always required a special kind of person.