Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

CVE-2022-1040 and CVE-2022-22247 are two recent vulnerabilities that have been discovered in two different Firewall products. This blog post will cover both the Sophos Firewall vulnerability (CVE-2022-1040) and the SonicWall Firewall vulnerability (CVE-2022-22247).

Today we’re excited to announce our new podcast – 'The Future of Security Operations.' Our first episode is with MongoDB’s CISO Lena Smart, and every other week from now on, we’ll have a new episode with another expert. I wanted to take a few minutes to explain why we’re launching this podcast and what you can expect to gain from listening.

By now, pretty much anyone who uses email is familiar with the term “phishing,” and is aware of the prevalence of phishing scams. However, the term “spear phishing”—and what it means exactly—might be a bit more elusive. Essentially, spear phishing is a more targeted and socially engineered version of a spray-and-pray, bait-and-hook, phishing email.

As revealed in the 2021 Devo SOC Performance ReportTM — which is based on the results of a survey of more than 1,000 security practitioners — organizations are frustrated with their SOC’s lack of effectiveness in performing its vital work. To combat the concerns the survey identified, it’s important for SOCs to refine how they operate.

In the business of security, linking performance metrics to strategy has become an accepted best practice. If strategy is the blueprint for building a security operations center (SOC), metrics are the raw materials. But there is a catch: a security organization can easily lose sight of its strategy and instead focus strictly on the metrics that are meant to represent it.

Comparing and contrasting the effectiveness of Vulnerability Assessment (VA), Vulnerability Management (VM), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (RBVM), and Managed Risk®. Performing a vulnerability assessment (VA), implementing a vulnerability management (VM) program, and upgrading your proactive security program with a risk-based vulnerability management (RBVM) approach may help your organization effectively deal with cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

There’s no question that centralized identity and access management (IAM) helps companies reduce risk and prevent attacks. But, as this week’s Okta attack shows, centralized IAM doesn’t eliminate all risks. Attackers with access to IAM data can use this information to easily access downstream systems or modify permissions to grant elevated access to malicious parties.

On Monday, March 21, 2022, Okta, an enterprise identity and access management firm, launched an inquiry after the Lapsus$ hacking group posted screenshots on their Telegram channel that the hackers claimed were taken after obtaining access to "Okta.com Superuser/Admin and various other systems." The screenshots that Lapsus$ provided included time stamps consistent with the January 16-21 timeframe provided by Okta.

Just a few years ago, security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) was the new buzzword associated with security modernization. Today, however, SOAR platforms are increasingly assuming a legacy look and feel. Although SOARs still have their place in a modern SecOps strategy, the key to driving SecOps forward today is no-code security automation.

Security operation teams continuously aim to focus on two main things: 1. Real cyber security threats (also known as “True Positive Alerts”), and 2. Reducing response time, especially when you have so many different sources to monitor. However, in reality, we deal with hundreds of security alerts on a daily basis, many of which are false positives that waste our valuable time. This is where incident response/security automation becomes a requirement rather than nice to have.