Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Featured Post

Four Excuses That Are Leaving Your Data Exposed to AI Risk

The generative AI revolution isn't on the horizon. It's already reshaping the way your employees work. Across every industry, workers are adopting AI-powered productivity tools at a pace that far outstrips most organisations' security and governance programmes. The question is no longer whether your organisation will use AI, but whether you're prepared to use it securely. The challenge is real, but so are the misconceptions that keep organisations from acting. Let's break down the four most common excuses and explore what it takes to build a data security foundation ready for the AI era.

Agent Identity: Why It Matters for AI Security

AI agent identity is a unique, digitally verifiable credential assigned to an autonomous AI system that defines who the agent is, what resources it can access, and on whose behalf it is acting. As AI systems move from answering questions to executing real-world actions independently, agent identity has become the new control plane for enterprise cybersecurity. Legacy identity and access management tools were built for humans behind a login screen and static service accounts running deterministic code.

The 1Password Environments MCP Server is now on Cursor Marketplace

AI agents are doing more than just generating code. Increasingly, they are working autonomously on complex coding challenges, touching production APIs, databases, and infrastructure across development environments, often without thorough human review. To perform these operations and access multiple systems, agents rely on developer secrets and non-human identities (NHI). But often, developers lack a secure way to share these secrets, leading to overprivileged, invisible access.

Top Security Risks of AI Agents

AI agents are rapidly moving from experimental projects into everyday business operations. Unlike traditional AI systems that generate content or answer questions, AI agents can take action. They can call APIs, access applications, retrieve data, execute workflows, and make decisions with limited human intervention. That shift is creating a new security challenge for enterprises.

Falcon AIDR Now Protects Copilot Studio Agents and Claude Code

Employees are already using AI at work. They build agents in Microsoft Copilot Studio, write code with Claude Code, and paste sensitive data into chatbots in the browser. Each of these actions can expose sensitive information outside of approved workflows, and most of it happens where traditional endpoint, network, and data loss prevention (DLP) security controls can't see the prompt or the tool call.

What Claude Mythos Means for Vulnerability Management Programs

If you've been following the cybersecurity conversation over the last several weeks, you've heard some version of the phrase “Claude Mythos changes everything.” It’s dominated the industry news cycles since early April. While the capabilities these stories tout are very much real, I have an issue with the framing being wrong when it comes to vulnerability management. There’s a narrative that Mythos and other frontier models will find too many vulnerabilities to deal with.

Find Your Security Gaps Before AI Does

Before AI Finds Your Forgotten Data, Find the Security Gaps Around It – AI does not need to bypass security when outdated permissions already provide a path. Ask an enterprise AI assistant to summarize what your organization knows about a customer, project, employee, or acquisition. Within seconds, it may surface years-old files, inactive collaboration spaces, past emails and chats, and documents that were shared more broadly than anyone remembers. No system had to be hacked.