Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

What is Endpoint Monitoring? Tools, Processes, Challenges

The traditional network perimeter is dead. In an era of hybrid work, cloud proliferation, and sophisticated insider threats, every laptop, server, and remote device connected to your system represents a potential attack vector. Endpoint monitoring has become an indispensable baseline for enterprise security, providing security leaders with continuous visibility into employee and device activity.

Is an AI SOC Better Than MDR? What Security Teams Should Weigh

Security teams are expected to investigate more alerts than they have people to handle. IBM's 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report puts a number on what that gap costs: organizations take an average of 158 days to identify a breach, and a further 83 days to contain it. That is 241 days of exposure, the fastest pace in nine years, and still measured in months. For most SOC teams, the bottleneck was never finding threats. It was having enough people to do anything about them.

4 Easy Steps To Secure Mobile Field Work

A field tech at a customer site can log into a scheduling app, pull up an invoice, and snap a site photo in under five minutes while connected to open Wi-Fi. That mobile device holds customer addresses, signed work orders, access codes, account credentials, and job-site photos. Unlike an office workstation that sits behind a firewall and never leaves the building, a field device moves through unfamiliar networks and high-risk physical spaces daily.

4 Easy Standards To Protect Team Data

Protecting team data starts at the workstation level, moving beyond access logs or password policies to secure the physical environment each employee operates in every day. Inconsistency creates immediate exposure points across the office because varying screen habits and device positions generate discrete gaps that software policies cannot close alone.

4 Simple Habits To Stop Email Hackers

Stopping email hackers requires adopting four specific habits: letting AI filter inbound messages, identifying manufactured urgency, verifying requests through second channels, and locking accounts with passkeys. These zero-skill routines block the credential-harvesting tactics that compromise shopping, streaming, and financial profiles. Consider a content creator receiving a brand partnership offer from a recognizable sportswear company. The logo perfectly matches the corporate website, the tone sounds professional, and the message includes a simple link labeled to review the contract.

Top tips: Your work laptop has a life after office hours

Top tips is a weekly column where we highlight what’s trending in the tech world and share ways to stay ahead. This week, we’re taking a moment to talk about what goes on between you, your work laptop and the IT team once you log off for the day. You shut your laptop at the end of the workday. As far as you're concerned, work is over. But for your IT team, their work might just be getting started.

What is AI harness engineering?

Harness engineering is the practice of building the layer, including code, that turns an AI model from a text generator into an agent that can take actions. In short, an AI agent is a model plus a harness. The model decides what to do next, and the harness makes it happen, connecting the model to tools, context, external systems, and validation. In a lot of practical work, and especially in security work, the harness decides the quality of the output more than the choice of model does.

SolarWinds Web Help Desk Vulnerabilities: CVE-2026-28323 and CVE-2026-28299

On July 30th, 2026, SolarWinds released fixes for a critical Authentication-Bypass vulnerability in Web Help Desk (WHD) tracked as CVE-2026-28323, and a related high-severity Denial-of-Service vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-28299. Although no active exploitation has been observed yet, WHD is commonly internet-facing and the authentication bypass requires no credentials, making it a likely target once exploit code becomes available.

Mapping One Control Set to NIST CSF, ISO 27001 and CIS v8

Most security programs answer to three frameworks at once and document themselves three times. A customer questionnaire asks for ISO 27001 evidence, a cyber insurer asks for NIST CSF alignment, an assessor references CIS safeguards, and the same firewall rule gets described in three vocabularies for three audiences. The duplication is self-inflicted rather than required, and a holistic approach to cybersecurity GRC starts by recognizing that one program is being described repeatedly. ‍