Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

TL;DR: If your development, staging, and production API servers all trust the same OIDC issuer and audience, Kubernetes will accept the same cached kubectl token across all of them. You should use separate audiences in your API.

CISA has called SIEM-as-a-service (SIEMaaS) “the Rosetta Stone” for visibility for good reason. Federal defenders need to see what is happening across increasingly complex environments, understand what matters, and turn that context into action before an adversary achieves its objective.

Keeper Security, the leading zero-trust and zero-knowledge identity security and Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform, today announces a Freshservice Workflow integration that connects vault and privileged access requests to the ticketing systems IT and security teams already use. The integration lets agents fulfill Keeper vault access and approval requests – including Endpoint Privilege Manager and Cloud SSO device approvals – directly from a Freshservice ticket.

A model produces a figure, an event happens, and somebody asks whether the figure was right. It is the obvious question and it has almost no published answer, because the comparison is harder than it looks. ‍ A single realized loss cannot falsify a distribution. If a model puts a one percent chance on exceeding a threshold and the threshold is exceeded, the one percent case occurred, which is what the model said would sometimes happen. ‍

A cyber loss model has dozens of inputs and every one of them can be argued about. Record counts, downtime costs, control effectiveness, secondary loss factors, event likelihoods. ‍ A few of them determine the answer and the rest barely move it. Knowing which is which tells you where estimation effort belongs, and more usefully which disagreements about the model are not worth having. ‍

GitGuardian found a public GitHub repo tied to CISA leaking 844MB of live credentials. Agents Analysis flags which public leaks are actually yours.

At the 2026 PCI SSC North America Community Meeting in Vancouver, continuous compliance was a recurring theme: how do organizations move beyond point-in-time validation and keep security controls working as their environments change? For payment-page security, that question is especially practical. Your last assessment captured your environment at a point in time. Since then, a release may have added a checkout dependency. A vendor may have updated its JavaScript. Marketing may have changed a tag.

One of the earliest business lessons I learned is the importance of taking exceptional care of customers. Focusing on a positive customer experience is a commitment and a business success strategy I’ve followed at Barracuda Networks, Eagle Eye Networks and now here at Brivo. Customers value a real person answering the phone, knowledgeable technical support, and professionals with regional and vertical market expertise.

CVE-2026-86858 is an improper access control flaw in the ServiceNow AI Platform, classified as CWE-284. ServiceNow describes it as an unauthenticated privilege escalation reachable through GraphQL. In certain circumstances an unauthenticated user can create, modify, or delete instance data beyond what was intended. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.7 (High). Attack vector is network, attack complexity is low, and neither privileges nor user interaction are required.

An agentic SOC uses AI-powered investigation, analysis, and automation to gather data, connect activity, and handle repetitive investigative work. Analysts remain in control and focus on judgment, prioritization, and response. This addresses the need for machine-speed security operations as AI agents gain autonomy and Tier 1 access to systems. Spend five minutes watching a security analyst at work and the “AI will replace analysts” headline starts to sound out of touch.