Why isn’t your API gateway enough? Gateways control access; WAFs block known signatures. Neither sees what happens at the application layer—where SQL injection executes, where SSRF reaches your metadata service, where lateral movement begins. Runtime security monitors live behavior, not just perimeter traffic. What’s the real problem with API security tools? Most see only one layer. API security sees traffic patterns. Container security sees process execution.

What is a Kubernetes security dashboard? A visual interface showing your clusters’ security state—what’s vulnerable, what’s under attack, and what to fix first. Different from general dashboards like Lens or Rancher, which focus on cluster management rather than threat detection. Why do most security dashboards fail? They create more work. Alerts are siloed across tools, forcing hours of manual correlation.

Your Oracle database contains business-critical data that powers daily operations, customer transactions, and strategic decisions. Hardware failures, human errors, and ransomware attacks can destroy this data in seconds, stopping operations and costing you millions in recovery expenses and lost revenue. A proper Oracle database backup strategy determines whether your organization recovers quickly or faces extended downtime.

To reduce the risk of data loss, organizations rely on proven backup strategies. In this guide, we explain what the 3-2-1 backup rule is, how it works, and how to apply it correctly. Topics discussed in this piece: click to expand What is the 3-2-1 backup rule? Three data copies Two different media One off-site copy Is the 3-2-1 backup rule still the industry best practice? Ever heard of the 3-2-1-1-0 backup rule? Alternative 4-3-2 strategy How do these compare against each other?

Privileged access programs were designed for environments where access could be defined ahead of time. That assumption no longer holds in the cloud. Legacy PAM emerged in a world of static infrastructure, long-lived systems, and a relatively small number of privileged users. Access patterns were predictable. Roles could be created in advance, assigned broadly, and reviewed periodically. That model was imperfect, but it worked well enough.

CVE-2025-34299 is a critical vulnerability in Monsta FTP, a web-based file transfer tool, unauthenticated arbitrary file write via remote download leading to remote code execution (RCE). Affecting versions 2.11 and earlier, it enables attackers to upload malicious files via a crafted SFTP or FTP connection, compromising servers without credentials. This flaw has seen active exploitation through opportunistic scans. By January 2026, Vulnerable instances remain exposed.

As an MSP security team today, you’re constantly running a rat race. You’re juggling multiple tools, sifting through a constant stream of alerts, and working in diverse environments to ensure you keep every endpoint protected. Fragmented solutions and limited automation exacerbate operational challenges, particularly as threats continue to evolve and become increasingly difficult to identify.

SantaStealer spreads via Telegram and underground forums, the BlackForce phishing kit targets major brands, and Ink Dragon launches new attacks.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly ingrained in every aspect of healthcare diagnostics, financial systems, autonomous vehicles, and critical infrastructure. Still, the reality has set in: these systems are under threat unlike anything we have seen, and existing cybersecurity frameworks were never designed to handle AI-specific threats.

In the world of Software Composition Analysis (SCA), we often treat the tuple of (package_name, version) as a unique identifier. For example, given an NPM package angular version 1.8.0 - we would know precisely which source code was used, and what vulnerabilities affect that version.It is a common misconception that a package version maps directly to a fixed set of source code and, by extension, a static vulnerability profile.