AI adoption within AWS environments is accelerating faster than most security and governance programs. AI agents, APIs, MCP servers, and model integrations are entering production across cloud environments, often without centralized visibility or runtime controls. In this webinar, you’ll see how teams can discover AI workloads across AWS accounts, understand what AI systems are actually doing at runtime, enforce policy in real time, and generate continuous governance evidence without slowing engineering teams down. The session focuses on practical operational capabilities for AI systems already running in production.
In this video, we break down why skipping code reviews is a massive mistake that will ultimately slow you down, leave you vulnerable, and compromise your system's accountability. We dive into three concrete reasons why reviewing AI-generated pull requests actually makes you a faster, safer developer, including a real-world story of a production bug caught in under 90 seconds. Resources Chapters.
Organizations assess and manage AI-related risks by establishing a cross-functional governance framework, mapping risks based on impact and financial likelihood, and instituting continuous monitoring that connects AI asset discovery to risk quantification, compliance, and enforcement. The most effective programs treat AI risk management not as a one-time assessment but as a continuous, data-driven discipline that evolves alongside the AI systems it governs.
AI adoption has accelerated faster than most organizations’ ability to manage it. Security and compliance teams are now responsible for overseeing machine learning models, large language models (LLMs), agentic AI systems, and shadow AI — often with frameworks and processes that weren’t built for any of it. The gap between deploying AI and governing it responsibly is where risk lives. AI governance tools exist to close that gap.
It’s amazing how non-developers have recently been empowered to create their own apps that can even generate revenue. We’ve recently seen progress across the AI development field, from AI being successful in “greenfield code” (apps built from scratch) towards “brownfield code” (larger scale existing applications).
In early July 2026, researchers at Sysdig published an analysis of what they assess to be the first documented case of agentic ransomware. The threat actor, which Sysdig calls JADEPUFFER, launched an extortion attack driven end to end by a large language model (LLM) rather than a conventional human-operated toolkit.
Enterprise AI is spreading fast across employees, applications, and agents. Security teams need a way to enable AI adoption without losing visibility, control, or governance. In this demo, see how Cato helps organizations secure AI across three fronts: · AI employees use, including sanctioned and unsanctioned AI tools· AI applications teams build, including LLM apps connected to enterprise data· Agentic AI, where agents can access tools, data, and workflows.
AI has swiftly shifted from a browser-based chat interface to an autonomous actor operating within enterprise environments. Agents run locally on endpoints, inherit employee permissions, access sensitive data in bulk, and execute multi-step workflows with no human approving each step. That shift fundamentally changes the enforcement surface. The governance programs most organizations have built were designed for a different model: one user, one prompt, one decision.
Organizations keep their databases behind firewalls for a reason: the data inside is the data they can least afford to lose. A new class of AI middleware–Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers–exists specifically to reach into those protected systems on an AI model's behalf. One of them, DBHub, connects directly to SQL databases.