|
By Gary Hayslip
Agentic AI fails differently than traditional software. When a service crashes, alerts trigger, processes restart, and humans intervene. In contrast, an agent encountering a problem continues operating, reasoning past faults, improvising around missing inputs, and proceeding with actions. In these systems, failure redirects execution rather than stopping it. Many AI roadmaps have not yet fully considered this design challenge.
|
By Dan Levy
The Homegrown Agent Maturity Model for Execution & Risk (HAMMER): is a five-level framework with seven domains for security teams to locate where they stand on securing homegrown agents, then make the case for what they need to advance. The most powerful AI agents in your enterprise may be ones you never bought. Your own teams are building them by wiring models, tools, and data into software that acts on its own, often with little security approval or oversight.
|
By Gary Hayslip
I have lived through major incidents firsthand, including the urgent calls that come in the middle of the night. In my experience, the teams that contain damage quickly are not the ones with the most tools. They’re the ones that ask the right questions in the first hour.
|
By Gary Hayslip
I’ve been on enough middle-of-the-night incident calls to know what separates the organizations that recover quickly from the ones that don’t. It’s rarely the size of the security budget. It’s whether leadership asks the right questions in the first hour, and then lets the team work.
|
By Ben Hanson
Agentic AI security is a new budget line for most organizations, which means security buyers across EMEA often face the dual challenge of evaluating solutions and justifying the spend at the same time. For organizations operating within the EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA, the business case has a dimension that doesn't exist in less regulated markets: the cost of non-compliance is not a vague, abstract risk.
|
By Harrison Johnson
Zenity pioneered AI Agent Security because we recognized early that agents would require a different approach to protection. Software that can access sensitive data, use tools, and creator credentials to take action on their behalf requires security that understands what the agents can do and how they actually behave. Today, Zenity is joining as a founding member of the ServiceNow Control Tower Alliance.
|
By Amir Abramovitch
Cohere's researchers caught Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, Alibaba's August preview of its Qwen4 architecture, attempting an unrequested upload during a routine security task. They were running it through CTI-REALM, Microsoft's benchmark for agents doing a security analyst's job. The task: write a rule that detects curl downloading a bash script to /tmp and executing it.
|
By Brandon Borodach
Every security team I talk to has some version of the same document. It might be called an “AI Acceptable Use Policy” or “Agent Governance Standards.” It usually lives in Confluence or SharePoint. It says sensible things: coding agents shouldn’t touch production credentials, assistants shouldn’t email sensitive data outside the company, and nobody should connect an unvetted MCP server to an agent with access to customer records.
|
By Yonatan Michaeli
An AI innovation team is asked to build a customer support assistant in two weeks. The demo works, employees start using it, and leadership wants to put it in front of customers. Somewhere between the prototype and the rollout, the team has created a new data table, an API endpoint, and a scheduled job. The project has a sponsor. Does every piece across the customer support assistant have an owner?
|
By Rock Lambros
Security investment decisions are always, at some level, conversations about risk quantification: how much exposure does the organization actually carry, what does it cost to reduce that exposure, and what's the cost of not acting at all. For agentic AI security, these questions are answerable once the right measurement is in place.
|
By Zenity
Zenity's low-code security research team is exposed to real world low-code applications on a daily basis, and we're glad to share our knowledge in this domain in order to help you to design and develop secure low-code applications.
- November 2026 (2)
- October 2026 (15)
- September 2026 (10)
- August 2026 (10)
- July 2026 (9)
- June 2026 (14)
- May 2026 (6)
- April 2026 (11)
- March 2026 (9)
- February 2026 (3)
- January 2026 (6)
- December 2025 (7)
- November 2025 (6)
- October 2025 (8)
- September 2025 (7)
- August 2025 (1)
- July 2025 (2)
- June 2025 (7)
- May 2025 (5)
- April 2025 (6)
- March 2025 (1)
- February 2025 (3)
- January 2025 (4)
- December 2024 (5)
- November 2024 (2)
- October 2024 (2)
- September 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (3)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (6)
- April 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (3)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (5)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (7)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- November 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (3)
- April 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (3)
- October 2021 (3)
Continuously protecting all low-code/no-code applications and components! Design and implement governance policies, identify security risks, detect emerging threats and drive automatic mitigation and response.
Low-code/no-code development and automation platforms are the wave of the future. The largest companies in the world are already adopting low-code/no-code development for their core business units. But with all their benefits, low-code/no-code development brings with it a host of governance challenges and risks that are unaddressed by existing InfoSec and AppSec solutions.
Zenity, the first and only governance and security platform for low-code/no-code applications, creates a win-win environment where IT and information security can give business and pro developers the freedom and independence they want in order to continue pushing their business forward while retaining full visibility and control.
Our Platform:
- Discover: Identify shadow-IT business applications across your low-code/no-code fleet and track sensitive and business data movement.
- Mitigate: Identify insecure, vulnerable and risky configurations. Drive mitigation and remediation immediately.
- Govern: Design policies and implement automatic enforcement. Eliminate risks without disrupting business.
- Protect: Detect suspicious and malicious activity, such as supply-chain attacks, malware obfuscation and data leakage.
Governance and Security for Low-Code/No-Code Applications.