Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Secure Enterprise AI Innovation with Cato AI Security

Enterprise AI is spreading fast across employees, applications, and agents. Security teams need a way to enable AI adoption without losing visibility, control, or governance. In this demo, see how Cato helps organizations secure AI across three fronts: · AI employees use, including sanctioned and unsanctioned AI tools· AI applications teams build, including LLM apps connected to enterprise data· Agentic AI, where agents can access tools, data, and workflows.

Agentic AI Governance Requires a New Enforcement Model

AI has swiftly shifted from a browser-based chat interface to an autonomous actor operating within enterprise environments. Agents run locally on endpoints, inherit employee permissions, access sensitive data in bulk, and execute multi-step workflows with no human approving each step. That shift fundamentally changes the enforcement surface. The governance programs most organizations have built were designed for a different model: one user, one prompt, one decision.

Data leakage risks with DBHub MCP servers

Organizations keep their databases behind firewalls for a reason: the data inside is the data they can least afford to lose. A new class of AI middleware–Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers–exists specifically to reach into those protected systems on an AI model's behalf. One of them, DBHub, connects directly to SQL databases.

What Server Do You Need to Run an AI Language Model?

Running your own AI model sounds exciting, but one question appears almost immediately: what kind of server do you actually need? A small language model can run on a personal workstation, while a large 70B parameter model may require enterprise-grade GPUs and expensive infrastructure. Choosing the wrong hardware can lead to wasted money, unnecessary complexity, or disappointing performance.

What AI Governance Tools Exist in the Market Today

‍AI governance tools are software platforms designed to help organizations manage AI risks, ensure regulatory compliance, and enforce responsible AI use across the machine learning lifecycle. The market has expanded rapidly, and in 2026 it includes tools spanning compliance automation, model observability, data governance, infrastructure security, and integrated risk quantification.

The Safety Problem Nobody Warns You About When You Start Training a Language Model

There's a version of the LLM safety conversation that stays comfortably abstract - AI alignment, existential risk, theoretical failure modes that matter at a scale most organizations will never reach. That conversation is important, but it's not the one most product and technology leaders need to be having right now. The one they need to be having is more immediate and considerably more practical: how the specific decisions made during llm training services directly shape whether the model you deploy is one your organization can actually stand behind.

Latency Lessons From Building a ReAct AI Agent for Agentic Search

Egnyte AI surfaces insights from an organization's documents for regulated industries—life sciences, financial services, architecture, engineering, and construction—and does that within existing permissions and compliance controls. Our AI Assistant is the conversational front door. Ask a question about your documents in plain language, summarise a contract, find the latest version, pull a compliance clause, and get an answer grounded only in the files you're permitted to see.

Best Tools for Securing MCP and LLM Integrations

Shadow IT used to mean employees spinning up unsanctioned software-as-a-service (SaaS) apps that stored company data without approval. Today, shadow MCP and unsanctioned LLM integrations represent the next evolution, and they're more dangerous. Model context protocol (MCP) servers don't merely store data; they act on it, executing code, calling APIs, and accessing internal tools on behalf of AI agents that developers connect with a config file.

Your Firewall Rules Are Drifting Right Now. You Just Can't See It

Firewalls are the single most common source of misconfiguration-related breaches, yet they get changed a hundred times a week and audited once a quarter. This is the network security gap AI attackers exploit first. Endpoint gets the budget. Identity gets the roadmap. The firewall gets changed constantly and reviewed rarely. It is also the control most tied to breaches: 42% of security teams pinned a firewall misconfiguration to a breach or near miss last year, ahead of EDR at 40% and identity at 39%.