Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Switching from GitLab to Azure DevOps offers the opportunity to reconsider your processes, streamline your pipelines, and match your tools with your objectives. Primarily if your company uses Microsoft software. Still, more than just technical expertise is needed for such a migration. It includes a plan to handle any potential problems. This article will help you get familiar with the complexities of migrating projects, repos, metadata, etc., between GitLab and Azure DevOps platforms.

The cybersecurity market continues to become more crowded, making it increasingly difficult for organizations to separate hype from reality and find security solutions that truly meet their needs. Messages sound the same. Demos look impressive, but how much is vision? And when the rubber meets the road, it’s hard to know what to expect in terms of the deployment, user experience, and impact to the business.

Thriving organizations maximally allocate resources. With seemingly infinite cybersecurity threats and finite resources, everyone needs to know the size of the threat to determine priority, and where to invest to maximize ROI. Elastic takes a quantified approach to cybersecurity risk management using FAIR to break threat scenarios into (A) likelihood and (B) losses to calculate risk per year, AKA annualized loss expectancy, or in FAIR terms, simply “risk”.

If you were keeping an eye on our What’s New, you noticed that March 6th saw a lot of activity! Our Product team was together for a “same-day-shipping” event where everyone collaborated on various projects to see what we could ship in just one day! Some key highlights from that day include: View the list of the Mar 6 updates →

The Future of Security Operations podcast has officially returned for its sixth season and I can't think of a better guest to kick things off than Christofer Hoff. Christofer has over 30 years of experience in network and information security architecture, development, engineering, operations, and management, including security leadership roles at Bank of America, Citadel, and Juniper Networks.

Most teams approach network penetration testing the same way: pick a few well-known tools, run automated scans, and call it a day. But in today’s evolving threat landscape, that is a losing strategy. Attackers do not just rely on off-the-shelf exploits but adapt, chain vulnerabilities, and find gaps that automated tools miss. CTOs and engineering leaders need to rethink their approach with respect to context, strategy, and how they integrate into your security workflow.

Imagine a bridge built without stress testing, where engineers only check for cracks after construction. When flaws inevitably appear, they scramble to patch weak spots until the subsequent failure forces another round of inspections. This is how most companies still approach pentesting: periodic assessments, reactive fixes, and security are treated as unwelcome checkpoints.

Cyber security threats continue to evolve, but one factor remains consistent: human error is still the greatest risk to modern businesses worldwide. Employees make mistakes, bypass security measures, and fall victim to sophisticated social engineering attacks, leading to devastating data breaches. Despite extensive security awareness training, the reality is that investing more time and money in training isn’t solving the problem.