Proprietary data is the definitive differentiator in the age of AI. Models can be replicated, infrastructure can be rented, and tools can be replaced. What cannot be easily reproduced is institutional knowledge, customer insight, and strategic intent found in enterprise data. This data must be continuously identified, deeply understood, and actively protected as it changes state, location, and context.

Cyber threat intelligence is often presented as a catalog of named threat actors, past incidents, and attribution labels that promise clarity. For defenders trying to understand risk, this structure feels reassuring. It suggests that threats can be identified, tracked, and anticipated based on observed behaviors. In practice, that confidence is often overstated.

Amazon Machine Images (AMIs) are templates for launching and scaling Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. Because Amazon EC2 AMIs are reused across environments and automation pipelines, decisions about how you build, source, manage, and share them directly affect your cloud attack surface.

In this second installment of a series on the transformation of SafeBreach’s development organization, VP of Development Yossi Attas details a structured operational workflow that integrates Jira, BitBucket, and Claude Code to turn AI usage from ad-hoc prompting into a rigorous engineering methodology.

In my previous piece, "The Agentic AI Governance Blind Spot," I laid out what I believe is one of the most critical gaps in the AI governance landscape today: the three most cited frameworks in AI governance, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act, don’t contain a single mention of agentic AI. Not one reference to autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, or AI that takes actions with real-world consequences. The response to that piece confirmed what I suspected.