Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

The security attack that hid inside your observability data

How teams are leaving value on the table and what it costs when they do It's 3:00 a.m. Your on-call engineer gets paged that the central processing unit (CPU) is at 97% on payment-processor-01. They open their observability platform, look at the metric spike, reboot the host, and close the ticket.

Cybersecurity Leaders React to OpenAI's Hugging Face Breach UpGuard

In July 2026, OpenAI's own AI agents escaped their sandbox and reached Hugging Face's production systems during an internal cybersecurity evaluation. In its latest report, OpenAI called the incident "a warning shot for us and for the world." We asked cybersecurity leaders for their reactions to the breach and what it signals for every team racing to deploy AI. One detail stands out. Hugging Face's own systems detected the attack and traced its full shape, but the alert never escalated high enough for a human to act on it.

Sophisticated Attacks No Longer Require Sophisticated Attackers

For years, the sophistication of a cyberattack was closely connected to the sophistication of the attacker behind it. Advanced campaigns required experienced threat actors with the knowledge, resources, and time needed to research targets, understand environments, create convincing interactions, adapt when something failed, and coordinate complex operations. Artificial Intelligence is beginning to change that relationship.

Introducing Adaptive Intelligence: Undermining the economics of every bot attack

Modern bot threats are increasingly driven by determined, sophisticated attackers. Often it is not even one person, but a group trading techniques with each other or a commercial service sold to anyone willing to pay. For many of them, getting past bot detection is a full-time job they genuinely enjoy. Block them and they get to work, finding a workaround. AI has simplified this further, making it even easier to set up complex configurations for attackers, lowering the overhead of an attack.

What Is Prompt Injection, Really? Why the Textbook Answer Cannot Tell You If You Have an Incident

Prompt injection is three things happening at once. The definition written in 2022 described a model that followed an instruction hidden in the text it was asked to translate. The definition needed in 2026 describes an agent that read a support ticket and then queried a customer table it had never touched, using a service account nobody had revoked. Those are the same attack.

Prompt Injection Examples: 10 Real Attacks, and Which Ones Would Work on Your Agent

Prompt injection has not changed since 2022. What the model can do has. The instruction that hijacked a translation bot four years ago and the one that opened a homeowner’s windows last year are the same request: do something you are already allowed to do. The first system could only talk. The second could operate devices. Same sentence, different consequence. Here are ten real attacks, in order, and for each one the thing the system was allowed to do that made it work.

Financial Firm Stops Identity Attack in Under 2 Hours

Developing the full picture of an incident is essential for SOC teams responding to complex threats. A financial firm faced this challenge when attackers created legitimate accounts within their Google Workspace environment. While native alerts flagged the activity, investigators needed deeper context to determine scope and exposure. With Corelight, the team gained the network evidence and chronological activity timeline needed to scope the incident and restore full visibility.

How to Protect Digital Ministries in the Age of Cloud Computing

Church ministry no longer stops at the sanctuary door. Livestreams, online giving, prayer forms, volunteer platforms, email systems, and social channels now carry much of the weekly work. That reach is certainly important. But still, every new account creates another place where credentials, personal records, or payment information can slip into the wrong hands. Churches often manage this digital estate with small teams, rotating volunteers, and limited technical oversight.