Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

In 2024, one of Vanta’s engineering goals was to improve the quality while maintaining our rapid product development. Around the same time, we also discovered we were months away from reaching our MongoDB Atlas database storage limit. If this threshold was reached, then we wouldn't be able to write any new data and the Vanta product would’ve been heavily degraded. This was a clear signal that we needed to invest more in our infrastructure and storage solution. ‍

The EU AI Act introduced the first comprehensive, harmonized regulatory framework for managing AI systems ethically and responsibly. Before the Act, the closest we had to such robust guidelines was ISO 42001, which has a similar overarching goal. ‍ If you’ve already implemented ISO 42001, you might have a head start in achieving EU AI Act compliance. In this guide, we explain why this is the case by covering: ‍

A risk register is a GRC tool used by teams to identify, assess, and manage various risks within an organization. It acts as a centralized repository and looks at the impact and probability of a risk to prioritize its management. In cyber security, a risk register helps maintain compliance with various standards like the ISO 27001 Information Security Management System (ISMS), NIST SP800-30 Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments, or the new European NIS 2 directive.

A practical guide for chief AI officers and technology leaders implementing federal AI governance The US Office of Management and Budget's recent memoranda — M-25-21, "Accelerating Federal Use of AI through Innovation, Governance, and Public Trust," and M-25-22, "Driving Efficient Acquisition of Artificial Intelligence in Government" — establish comprehensive frameworks for federal agencies that implement AI systems while maintaining appropriate safeguards.

With NIS 2 becoming part of national laws, compliance has become mandatory for organizations within its scope. ‍ Although NIS 2 has addressed some of its predecessor’s shortcomings by expanding its scope and setting clearer security and reporting requirements, it remains demanding for security and compliance teams. Its prescriptive guidance and requirements are still limited in certain areas, which can leave teams uncertain about the exact steps to take.

Our second annual VantaCon UK event featured thought-provoking conversions with founders, CISOs, and security leaders from Synthesia, Okta, Klarna, Pigment, Multiverse, and more. ‍ During the event, speakers touched on the complexities of building trust in the age of AI, discussed specific regulatory challenges in the EU, and shared practical tips for modern CISOs operating amidst an evolving regulatory landscape and complex risk environment.

Enterprises rely heavily on third-party vendors for a vast spectrum of critical services. From IT support and supply chain management to specialized consulting and cybersecurity, the reliance on external partners has increased significantly. With this reliance comes the inherent risk that these vendors may pose to enterprise operations, reputation, and regulatory compliance.