Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

An intern gets admin access to production for a temporary task, but nobody remembers to revoke it. Imagine that intern works at machine speed, never sleeps, and can chain dozens of actions before you’ve read the Slack ping—and has no instinct for when they’re about to do something irreversible.

In November, we shared our vision for the Future of Snyk Container, outlining a fundamental shift in how teams secure the modern container lifecycle. We promised a future where security doesn’t just “scan” but scales effortlessly with the speed of the AI-driven, agentic world. Today, we are thrilled to announce that we are moving from vision to reality.

Human risk management (HRM) focuses on one of the most persistent cybersecurity vulnerabilities: humans. Social engineering attacks that trick users into taking risky actions are a factor in 98% of cyberattacks not because they are technically complex, but because they manipulate employee behavior. Unlike traditional, one-size-fits-all security awareness training, human risk management focuses on changing employee behavior through monitoring and targeted reinforcement.

AI-assisted development helps teams write code faster, but that speed comes with added security risk. As agents generate more code, they can introduce vulnerabilities, insecure dependencies, or exposed secrets, often before a human reviewer ever sees the change. Security teams are left reviewing more code with the same resources, which makes it harder to catch issues early.

The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is a guide that helps organizations spot and reduce risks in AI systems. This framework was released in January 2023 by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. The framework is built around four key steps, namely: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage, and is meant to help teams responsibly use AI. It doesn’t matter which industry you work in or which AI you use; this framework works everywhere.

AI adoption does not happen uniformly across an organization. Some employees have integrated generative AI (genAI) tools into core parts of their workflow. Others have barely opened one. Most are somewhere in between, experimenting on an ad hoc basis, without consistent visibility into what data those tools handle or where it goes. That variance is the problem. Security programs built around either universal AI adoption or zero AI adoption will miss most of the actual risk.