Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Protecting sensitive data is no longer just a compliance objective. It has become a prerequisite for adopting cloud services, enabling AI, and maintaining customer trust. Yet many organizations still struggle to balance innovation with effective data governance. A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study commissioned by Microsoft found that organizations using mature data protection capabilities, including data loss prevention (DLP), achieved a 30% reduction in the likelihood of data breaches.

Most agentic triage solutions hand you a verdict and stop right there. Maybe you get an alert ranking, maybe a severity score, maybe some light investigation, but you, as the analyst, still have to do the cleanup manually. There is still a mountain of evidence that needs to be gathered by hand, and a mountain of cases to dig through on your own.

Enterprise RAG pipelines have a recall stage and a precision stage. The retriever handles recall. The reranker handles precision. Skipping the reranker, or misplacing security controls around it, is where most accuracy and data exposure problems begin. The retriever’s job is to pull back every document that might be relevant. The reranker’s job is to find, from that candidate set, the documents that actually answer the question.

A study has found that AI chatbots can be more effective at social engineering than human scammers, WIRED reports. The researchers looked at a form of romance scam commonly known as “pig butchering,” in which scammers spend weeks or months building a relationship with the victim before tricking them into sending money for a phony investment scheme.

AI is making social engineering attacks significantly more effective, according to a new report from cyber insurance firm Resilience. These attacks were behind more than 85% of losses in the first half of 2026, compared to less than 20% during H1 2024. “Losses tied to phishing, social engineering, and transfer fraud have climbed from 17.7% of incurred losses in H1 2024 to 85.3% in H1 2026, the single largest increase in the report’s five half-year comparison,” Resilience says.

For twenty years, the software security playbook has worked the same way. You find the vulnerability, score it, open a ticket, assign it to a human, wait for the fix, ship the patch, and prove it happened. Every step in that sequence assumes humans can review each fix individually and still keep up. Frontier AI broke that assumption. The exploit window has collapsed from weeks to hours. Attackers reason across your codebase, chain their findings, and ship exploits before a CVE is even published.

The riskiest thing an AI agent does all day isn’t writing code. It’s shopping. Every few minutes, it reaches out for a package, an AI asset, or a tool, and pulls it in with no real way to check what’s inside. We think the fix is agent immunization: security that lives inside what an agent consumes, builds, and ships, not a wall built around it.

Claude Mythos is arguably the strongest cybersecurity model that Anthropic has built. But we know that model capability is only part of what determines how well an AI vulnerability product performs. To test that, we put Anthropic’s Claude Security, which runs on Mythos, and Aikido Code Security Audit head-to-head on the exact same target to see which harness can deliver the best coverage and at what cost. Code Security Audit is part of Aikido’s AI Code Analysis suite.