The National Industrial Security Program (NISP), the authority within the United States for access to classified data by government contractors. Have outlined requirements to ensure continued availability and integrity of classified data, and prevent its unauthorised disclosure. The operating manual (NISPOM) affects all government agencies and commercial contractors who have access to classified data.
Trustwave has achieved supplier status with Bridgepointe, a tech advisory firm that helps mid-market and enterprise companies transform tech investments into unrivaled business results. The Bridgepointe deals connects Trustwave to Bridgepointe’s expansive network to provide Trustwave security consulting, managed detection and response, threat hunting, co-managed SOC, database security, and email security services to their set of clients.
Generative AI, the transformative technology causing a stir in the global tech sphere, is akin to an enthralling narrative with its charming allure and consequential dark underbelly. Its most notable impact is forecasted in the realm of identity proofing, creating ripples of change that demand our immediate attention.
In the modern, cloud-first era, traditional data protection technology approaches struggle to keep up. Data is rapidly growing in volume, variety, and velocity. It is becoming more and more unstructured, and therefore, harder to detect, and consequently, to protect.
Today’s fast-paced digital landscape requires quick actions and top-notch safeguarding. Code signing is crucial in providing that security, but teams must approach the process effectively. Unfortunately, managing digital certificates, a vital component of code signing, often becomes complex and error-prone for organizations, leading to potential risks and vulnerabilities.
Code signing certificates are crucial in verifying a software application’s source and assuring users that the code has not been tampered with or maliciously modified. However, like any security measure, code signing is not immune to abuse. Hackers and cybercriminals are constantly finding new ways to exploit vulnerabilities in digital signing processes, making it imperative for developers and organizations to take proactive steps to safeguard their code signing certificates.
The debate surrounding the integration of best-of-breed versus a single-vendor security platform has been discussed for some years. On one side, we have niche solutions that offer a specialized approach to addressing cybersecurity challenges. On the other side, there are the potential benefits of a consolidated platform that promises seamless interoperability for an exponential improvement of security posture.
“How does Detectify’s External Attack Surface Management platform compare to Penetration testing” or “What I’m really looking for is Penetration testing” are two statements we often hear when talking to prospects. We know that many of you are keen to understand how EASM compares with Penetration testing (Pen testing), so we’re exploring these two methodologies side-by-side.
In today’s interconnected digital landscape, cyber threats have become more and more sophisticated and prevalent, posing a huge risk to individuals, organizations, and even nations. To understand and stop these evolving threats effectively, cybersecurity agencies rely on advanced tools and technologies. One such tool is Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIPs), which play a crucial role in enhancing the capabilities of these agencies.
