The announcement of Log4j vulnerability cve-2021-44228 sent security and development teams into a tailspin and highlights the one of biggest challenges of open source security: dependency management. The open source libraries that make up up to 80% of our applications are often a tangled web of dependencies.

The notorious Log4Shell vulnerability CVE-2021-45046, has put Log4j in the spotlight, and grabbed the entire Java community’s attention over the last couple of weeks. Maintainers of Java projects that use Log4j have most probably addressed the issue. Meanwhile, non-java developers are enjoying relative peace of mind, knowing that they are unaffected by one of the major vulnerabilities found in recent years. Unfortunately, this is an incorrect assumption.

A third Log4j2 vulnerability was disclosed the night between Dec 17 and 18 by the Apache security team, and was given the ID of CVE-2021-45105. According to the security advisory, 2.16.0, which fixed the two previous vulnerabilities, is susceptible to a DoS attack caused by a Stack-Overflow in Context Lookups in the configuration file’s layout patterns. What is this CVE about? What can you do to fix it? How does it differ from the previous CVEs?

As security and development teams rushed to assess the now-notorious Log4Shell vulnerability published December 10 (CVE-2021-44228), another, more minor vulnerability was discovered in Log4j — CVE-2021-45046. To understand the newly-discovered vulnerability, it is important to get the full picture and background on the original Log4j issue.

A newly published critical vulnerability in Apache’s widely popular Log4j Java library, CVE-2021-44228 (CVSS score 10) was published over the weekend, causing a lot of concern.

Software development organizations are investing more and more resources in their vulnerability management programs. According to Gartner’s forecast, in 2021 enterprise security spending was expected to break records and grow 12.4% to reach 150.4 billion. But how do organizations know if they’re spending their security resources wisely? The answer can only be found by crunching the numbers.