Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

TL;DR: Active-active runs every node live so traffic distributes across the pool and failover is near-instant, but it forces you to solve multi-writer conflicts through last-writer-wins, vector clocks, CRDTs, or consensus protocols. Active-passive keeps one authoritative primary with an idle standby, trading seconds to minutes of promotion time for predictable behavior, simpler troubleshooting, and lower cost under steady load.

Successful executive leadership goes beyond monitoring employees’ every move; it also needs a clear, factual picture of digital workflows, which apps are being used, and how much work available talent can do. Today, when many organizations are dealing with a shift to hybrid work, soaring software subscription pricing, and new productivity requirements, executive workforce activity and app consumption reporting are helping leaders stay on top of it all.

Continuous control monitoring and a once-a-year, point-in-time pentest don't sit well together. A manual test means scoping, waiting for a slot, and holding up the audit window for the report. Teams choose Drata to get audit-ready quickly: controls monitored continuously, evidence collected automatically. The pentest is the part that doesn't move at that speed.

Development teams ship faster than ever with AI-assisted coding. Features that previously took weeks can now be delivered in days. But security testing still runs on the old schedule. In Aikido's 2026 State of AI in Pentesting report, we found that 76% of organizations deploy significant production changes weekly or faster, while just 21% validate security on every release. Katie Norton, Senior Research Manager at IDC, summed it up.

Every Operating System – not even counting the software installed on top of it – has a myriad of configuration settings that affect security. Windows Server alone has 4000+ configurable options, out of which 200+ are important for security & compliance efforts. They include: These settings are at the very core of all of your security & compliance efforts – and they are surprisingly often ignored.

Any SCA tool worth its salt has reachability analysis these days. When a dependency has a known vulnerability, these tools can tell you whether your code calls the affected function. This is pretty much non-negotiable because it helps teams focus their security efforts instead of sifting through noise. Every other step in prioritizing dependency CVEs builds on it. But just because the vulnerable function is reachable doesn’t mean it’s exploitable.

AI guardrails are sold as a solution to keep models behaving as intended - but it can be hard to figure out what you’re getting. The problem starts with the word itself. "Guardrails" means different things depending on who's selling them. Some vendors use it for simple prompt filtering, others bundle in entirely different controls and call it "guardrails" because the word sounds reassuring. Without a shared definition, buyers can't easily tell what they're actually getting.

For years, we described phishing as an email problem: an attacker writes a convincing message, sends it to thousands of people and waits for someone to click. That model is now outdated. Microsoft’s disruption of YAM Store, CoGUI and Iron Man exposed something much larger: a cloud-based impersonation industry.