Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

A UX Firm in Delaware and Designing for Fintech: Two Different Briefs

The short version Two searches show up in the same procurement folder. One looks for a UX firm Delaware founders can meet without a flight. The other looks for a team that has already shipped a regulated financial product. Those searches answer different questions, and the second one is harder to fake.

WAF vs WAAP API vs AI What Security Tools Do You Actually Need?

A straightforward framework for matching each layer of protection to the problem it actually solves. Trying to understand vendors in the modern application security space can feel a lot like trying to solve word scramble. Whether it’s remembering what the “A’s” in "WAAP” stand for, figuring out if “WAF” includes APIs, or assessing the actual function of a new AI security product, understanding what tools your team actually needs is getting harder all the time.

MDM vs. MAM: Which Mobile Management Option Fits Your Business?

Every IT team managing a mobile workforce eventually hits the same fork in the road: do you manage the whole device, or just the apps that matter? That question sits at the heart of the MDM vs. MAM debate. Getting the answer wrong can mean either locking down employee phones so tightly that people revolt, or leaving corporate data exposed on devices you barely control. Mobile Device Management (MDM) and Mobile Application Management (MAM) solve overlapping problems in very different ways.

AI Governance for Public Bodies, and Who Shares the Obligation

A public body running a high-risk AI system owes a fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27 before first use, with the results notified to a market surveillance authority. The obligation is real and it is not yet in force. ‍ Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force since July 2026, deferred the section of the Act containing Article 27 to December 2027 for standalone high-risk systems and August 2028 for those embedded in regulated products.

Vulnerability Management: A Complete Guide to the Process and Lifecycle

If your vulnerability management program runs on a fixed scan-and-patch cadence, whether monthly, quarterly, or tied to a compliance deadline, you are measuring your response time against an attacker timeline that continues to accelerate. Vulnerability management remains a foundational security discipline. It identifies real, exploitable flaws and gives teams a structured way to prioritize and remediate them.

Claude Mythos Explained: AI Finding Zero-Day Vulnerabilities and Chaining Exploits

Claude Mythos is an AI model capable of finding and chaining zero-day vulnerabilities at scale. That changes how attacks happen, especially in environments where you can’t patch fast enough. The Forescout Vistaro platform with VistaroAI helps organizations respond with real-time visibility and dynamic control across all connected devices.

Top 15 AI TRiSM Solutions By Category

AI TRiSM solutions address distinct risks across the AI lifecycle, from governance and evaluation to runtime security, agent authorization, and guardrails. In this comparison, the top 15 solutions fall into five complementary categories: These categories are complementary, not interchangeable. The right stack depends on where an organization needs to govern AI, monitor behavior, block threats, control agent privileges, or constrain AI interactions.

Feroot Expands DXComply with Code-Free Consent Auditing for Native Mobile Apps

New DXComply release enables privacy, GRC and security teams to verify whether native apps honor user consent choices without SDK integration or code changes. Toronto, Canada, September 23, 2026: Feroot Security Inc. today announced expanded native mobile application consent auditing capabilities in DXComply, enabling enterprises to verify whether iOS and Android apps honor users’ consent choices without requiring SDK integration or changes to application code.