Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Vendor security questionnaires accurately evaluate a third-party supplier’s attack surface, but only if they’re utilized intelligently. The quality, and therefore, accuracy, of questionnaires rapidly deteriorates when they become excessively lengthy, one-size-fits-all templates bloated with jargon. In this post, we suggest x actions for improving the accuracy of your security questionnaires and the overall efficiency of your security questionnaire process.

Fourth-party risk management is the process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating the cybersecurity risks posed by the vendors of your third-party vendors (your vendor’s vendors). With digital transformation compressing the boundaries between IT ecosystems, any of your vendors could be transformed from trusted suppliers to critical data breach attack vectors if they’re compromised.

‍Insider threats are one of the biggest internal cyber threats to organizations because they are often detected too late, and the responsible individual has access to sensitive information that gets released or exposed. Insider threats can pose a significant concern for organizations of all sizes and industries because they can result in severe financial and reputational damage and even legal penalties.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has outlined its third-party risk management requirements for United States national banks and federal savings associations in the OCC Bulletin 2013-29. These risk management standards don't only apply to third-party vendor relationships; the OCC expects all banks to follow best third-party risk management practices, whether activities occur internally or through service providers.

Vendor security ratings cannot be adjusted without modifying the criteria for evaluating a vendor’s security posture. Since the ability to make unmitigated adjustments violates the objectivity of security posture measurements, this functionality usually isn’t possible on security rating solutions. However, a workaround is to prevent certain discovered risks from influencing the calculation of a vendor’s security ratings.

A healthy financial sector is essential for economic stability and security. Cybersecurity frameworks can help financial organizations meet the requirements of financial regulations and ensure that the financial system operates safely and securely while protecting the rights and privacy of consumers.

The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on cybersecurity is quickly becoming a major topic as organizations across the world begin the race to adopt AI technology into their products, business models, or security programs. AI is quickly emerging as a field that has the potential to revolutionize the field of cybersecurity. However, the use of AI in cybersecurity brings on new challenges and risks just as much as it provides new and innovative solutions.

While some locations and organizations tend to be more at risk of a cyberattack or other security incidents involving data, it’s critical for all companies to consider the cyber threat landscape. Hackers are increasingly prolific and use increasingly advanced techniques and technology to perpetrate data breaches.

The Computer-Security Incident Notification Rule requires US federal banking organizations and banking service providers to notify the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) that a cybersecurity incident has occurred. The bank must ensure that the OCC receives this as soon as possible and no more than 36 hours after the incident has occurred.

NIST 800-161 — also identified as NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-161 — was published in April 2015 as Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Federal Information Systems and Organizations. In May 2022, a year after President Biden’s Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity, NIST produced a revised version, NIST 800-161 rev. 1 Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Systems and Organizations.