Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Kubernetes has transformed how we deploy and manage applications. It gives us the ability to spin up a virtual data center in minutes, scaling infrastructure with ease. But with great power comes great complexities, and in the case of Kubernetes, that complexity is security. By default, Kubernetes permits all traffic between workloads in a cluster. This “allow by default” stance is convenient during development, and testing but it’s dangerous in production.

Kubernetes Network Policies (KNP) are powerful resources that help secure and isolate workloads in a cluster. By defining what traffic is allowed to and from specific pods, KNPs provide the foundation for zero-trust networking and least-privilege access in cloud-native environments. But there’s a problem: KNPs are risky, and applying them without a clear game plan can be potentially disruptive.

Rolling out network policies in a live Kubernetes cluster can feel like swapping wings mid-flight—one typo or overly broad rule and critical traffic is grounded. Calico’s Staged Network Policies remove the turbulence by letting you deploy policies in staged mode, so you can observe their impact before enforcing anything.

Calico Enterprise lets users write network policies using domain names instead of IP addresses. This is done by dynamically mapping domain names to IP addresses and matching the egress traffic against these IPs. We have discussed this feature in detail when we introduced the Inline mode for the eBPF data plane in Calico Enterprise 3.20 release! It addresses the latency and performance issues of the various modes used by Calico in iptables/nftables data planes.

This story is becoming more and more common in the Kubernetes world. What starts as a manageable cluster or two can quickly balloon into a sprawling, multi-cluster architecture spanning public clouds, private data centers, or a bit of both. And with that growth comes a whole new set of headaches. How do you keep tabs on compliance across wildly different configurations? When a service goes down across multiple clusters, how do you pinpoint the cause amidst the chaos?

Today, organizations struggle managing disparate technologies for their Kubernetes networking and network security needs. Leveraging multiple technologies for networking and security for in-cluster, ingress, egress, and traffic across clusters creates challenges, including operational complexities and increased costs.

Calico provides a unified platform for all your Kubernetes networking, network security, and observability requirements. From ingress/egress management and east-west policy enforcement to multi-cluster connectivity, Calico delivers comprehensive capabilities. It is distribution-agnostic, preventing vendor lock-in and offering a consistent experience across popular Kubernetes distributions and managed services.

When I got the assignment to attend KubeCon 1st of April I thought it was an April prank, but as the date got closer I realized—this is for real and I’ll be on the ground in London at the tenth anniversary of cloud native computing. I’ve seen a lot of tech events during my years in the industry while trying not to get replaced by AI and I have to say this one stands out! Image source: CNCF YouTube Channel Here is my recap of KubeCon + CloudNativeCon Europe 2025.

When we first launched Project Calico in 2016, we set out to make Kubernetes networking easy, reliable, and scalable for all organizations. Our goal was to abstract away the complexity and performance overheads of other CNI plugins while simultaneously extending Kubernetes network policy to make it easier to secure your Kubernetes workloads.

In the rapidly evolving world of Kubernetes, network security remains one of the most challenging aspects for organizations. The shift to dynamic containerized environments brings challenges like inter-cluster communication, rapid scaling, and multi-cloud deployments. These challenges, compounded by tool sprawl and fragmented visibility, leave teams grappling with operational inefficiencies, misaligned priorities, and increasing vulnerabilities.