Software-in-the-loop (SiL) testing is a pivotal method in the software development lifecycle, especially for embedded systems and critical applications. By simulating real-world conditions and integrating software components within a controlled virtual environment, SiL allows for the early detection of bugs, ensuring higher code quality and reliability. Read on to learn how to introduce SiL testing in your project.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a federal agency within the Department of Health and Human Services. The FDA is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the control and supervision of medications, vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, medical devices, and other types of products. To ensure the safety and security of medical devices, the FDA supports a variety of standards and guidelines that medical device manufacturers are highly recommended to follow.

With AI finding adoption throughout all stages of the development process, the SDLC as we know it is becoming a thing of the past. Naturally, this has many implications for the field of software testing. This article will discuss how the SDLC has evolved over time, going into detail on the impact that AI adoption is having on both software development and software testing.

As AI integrates into every stage of the SDLC, the area of software testing is undergoing transformative and unprecedented changes. In this article, we will discuss the ethical considerations for AI-powered software testing, examining the advantages and potential hurdles generative AI presents as a new technology being applied across the SDLC.

Static code analysis is widely adopted among organizations for its ability to provide fast feedback loops and identify bugs early in development. However, despite its advantages, numerous bugs and vulnerabilities remain undetected and are only found when they've made their way into production or been caught by late-stage penetration testing. The best security practice involves leveraging both static and dynamic testing, such as fuzz testing.

As vehicles become increasingly reliant on software, secure and functional Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) are paramount. Unknown vulnerabilities in your automotive software can pose a significant threat to your products and business by putting you at risk of coding errors or insecure configurations, which can be exploited by malicious actors or lead to consequential failures.

In today's digital and interconnected era, the healthcare sector operates in a landscape of security risks. In 2023 alone, the number of vulnerabilities uncovered in medical devices jumped by 59% to 993 issues. Consequently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Commission, and other governmental agencies have issued cybersecurity guidelines for medical devices. Many of these guidelines advocate for fuzz testing as a means of vulnerability detection.

While unit testing is crucial for improving code quality and reducing later testing time, it consumes at least 15% of developers' time. Developers can utilize automated fuzz tests to allocate more time for developing new features. They replace negative test cases, constituting around 30% of unit tests. In a recent analysis of a Java project using a fuzzing platform, a single fuzz test was equivalent to potentially 309 unit tests, achieving 74% code coverage within just 25 seconds.

Security testing allows you to evaluate the robustness of applications and systems and identify potential weaknesses that attackers may exploit. DAST and fuzzing are two popular, important, and proven security testing methods.