Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Beyond the vault: Zero standing privilege defeats more than password attacks

Part 2 of 3 in our Rethinking Privileged Access series. Start with Part 1: The password was never the only problem. In Part 1, we drew the line between the vault-and-checkout model of legacy PAM and the session-and-Activities model of modern PAM with Netwrix Privilege Secure (NPS). One protects the password; the other eliminates the standing privilege behind it. That framing is a good starting point, but it understates the case. In Windows and Active Directory, the password is just the seed.

The hidden cost of over-permissioned service accounts

Service accounts, app integrations, and AI agents often have more access than any person, and they get reviewed last. That gives them one of the largest blast radiuses in the environment, meaning they can reach more if they're compromised. The Uber and Cloudflare breaches and the Salesloft Drift campaign against Salesforce customers show how attackers exploit these accounts. Check them for open, stale, orphaned, and privileged access, then cut access back to what they really use.

What Are Unmanaged Data Stores and How to Secure Them

Unmanaged data stores let permissions drift while sensitive data accumulates unnoticed. They are repositories an organization doesn’t actively govern, leaving them without an owner, an access-review cadence, or a retention policy. Securing them means assigning ownership, correcting access, and maintaining continuous governance and visibility.

How to write and enforce a removable media policy

Most organizations have a removable media policy. Few enforce one, and that shortfall drives breach costs and compliance exposure. Closing it takes a default-deny baseline, an approved-device register, encryption on everything you allow, expiring exceptions, and audit evidence proving each clause works. Writing a removable media policy takes an afternoon, and most organizations already have one covering USB drives and other portable storage.

Govern the AI agent as the identity it is

AI agents are non-human identities. They hold credentials, carry permissions, and act on systems around the clock, usually with standing access nobody reviews. The Salesloft Drift breach reached more than 700 organizations through exactly that kind of over-scoped, non-expiring token, with no prompt injection involved. The controls already exist: inventory every agent, scope it to least privilege, expire its access, review it on a schedule, and detect when it's abused.

Insider risk starts with who can read the data

Insider risk is often framed as an external attacker problem, but a real blind spot sits closer to home: who inside your own security stack can open sensitive files they never needed to see. Classification tools that require broad scanning access often hand that same access to every admin who configures them, turning the tool meant to reduce exposure into another path to it. The people with the least oversight, your own admins, can end up with the most unchecked visibility into regulated data.

Convergence of ITDR, PAM and IGA. Which of the three is standing there when the attack lands?

Our 2026 Identity and Data Security Report put compromised identity ahead of misconfigured permissions as the leading route to unauthorized access, 41.8% against 33.9%. If identity is the way in, the controls around identity belong together, and that's the reasoning behind most of the consolidation we've seen over the past few years. But how is the work split up?

Privileged user monitoring: Visibility without trust

Operations require elevated access and organizations grant it on trust, so privileged user monitoring has to turn that trust into evidence. An authorization record shows only that the system permitted an action. Monitoring produces a reviewable account of which elevated rights each person used and when, which lets an auditor or investigator test activity without disrupting administration.

How can organizations enforce separation of duties in access controls?

Separation of duties, also called segregation of duties, is a control that splits a sensitive business process across more than one person so no single user can both execute and approve the same action. Organizations enforce it by mapping conflicting duties into a matrix, applying role-based access control and least privilege, requiring independent approval on high-risk transactions, and reviewing access on a set cadence.

What an AD/Entra Hybrid Audit Actually Looks For & Why Most Teams Fail the First One

Most AD cleanup processes stop at the domain boundary, but hybrid audits don’t. Here’s what auditors actually check across Active Directory and Entra ID, and the gaps that trip up teams in their first review. Ask a few IT teams how they handle offboarding and you’ll hear the same answer: disable the account in Active Directory, close the ticket, and move on.