Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

March 2022

VPNs are increasingly common - how much can you see?

VPN tunnels are like shipping containers in that they are widely used (especially as the pandemic has moved more of the workforce to remote work), and they can be used to carry traffic for legitimate as well as malicious purposes. Establishing a tunnel between corporate offices, remote workers, or partners to transfer data is a legitimate and common use for VPNs.

SANS 2022 Cloud Security Survey

The state of cloud security is evolving. Many organizations are implementing new and more advanced cloud security services that offer cloud-focused controls and capabilities, including services and tools that provide network connectivity and security for end users and office locations, security monitoring and policy controls, and identity services, among others.

[Webcast] Defending against nation-state actors

With the threat of Russian cyberattacks on the rise, it’s essential for defenders of critical infrastructure to pressure test their cyber defense capabilities. In this webcast, Corelight's Alex Kirk reviews the specific techniques, tactics, and procedures that defenders should monitor in order to identify and disrupt attacks in their environment. Alex has a long and storied career as a cybersecurity professional, including a recent volunteer engagement training Ukrainian cyberdefenders this past fall.

SANS 2022 Ransomware Defense Report

The years 2020 and 2021 were undoubtedly the years of ransomware. Threat actors wasted no time taking advantage of the chaos caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, launching attacks that netted millions (if not billions) of dollars in extortion fees and leaked a record amount of data from victim organizations. On this webcast, we will look at how ransomware defenses have changed from 2020 through 2022. The webcast will also explore ransomware threat actor changes, current trends, and how to implement defenses against those trends.

Know your environment: Tenable/Corelight integration for prioritized IDS alerts

One of the major causes of alert fatigue for SOCs is a class of alerts that fall in between false positives and useful detections: when an actual attack has been launched, and the detection is working correctly, but the host on the receiving end is not vulnerable, guaranteeing that the attack will fail.

One SIEM is not enough?

The idea behind the SIEM (and now XDR!) technologies was to provide a single engine at the heart of the SOC, aggregating data, enabling analytics and powering workflow automation. The SIEM would act as one place to train analysts and integrate a range of complementary technologies and processes. Given the efficiency that comes from centralization, I was surprised to hear that a growing number of defenders are actually using two SIEMs. Why is that?