Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Most application-layer attacks slip past EDR, WAFs, and CNAPP because none of them watch what an app actually does at runtime. Miggo’s ADR platform does, detecting behavioral deviations agentlessly via DeepTracing and eBPF. With the new integration, those runtime detections flow directly into Seemplicity, where they’re correlated with cloud, code, and identity findings, deduplicated, and routed to the right owner.

Start with what the current backlog already costs: analyst hours spent on triage, developer time lost to duplicate tickets, slow MTTR, and manual reporting. Then tie each benefit of ASPM software to one of those costs, such as fewer tickets per fix or faster remediation. Compare pricing models on your real numbers, including integration upkeep, and propose a measurable pilot on five to ten high-value applications. Most AppSec teams don’t need to be sold on ASPM software.

Most teams need a combination of application security tools rather than a single one. Common categories are SAST, DAST, IAST/RASP, SCA, API and container security, and ASPM, and each covers a different stage of development. When you evaluate options, look for coverage that matches your stack, integration with developer workflows, accurate findings, risk-based prioritization, and actionable remediation guidance.

Copilots and assistants shipped into apps you own, agents reaching in through MCP servers and OAuth tool grants, and the service accounts and tokens they all run as. Almost none of it went through a review. This Reco + Seemplicity integration closes the gap between finding an exposed agent and fixing it. Reco discovers every agent operating across your apps, what data it reaches, and what actions it takes.

CTEM validation is the fourth stage of continuous threat exposure management. It confirms whether a prioritized exposure is actually exploitable in your environment and whether existing defenses would stop an attack. Common methods include penetration testing, breach and attack simulation, attack path analysis, and automated exploitability analysis.

Prioritization in CTEM is the process of determining which exposures should be addressed first based on the risk they pose in your specific environment. Rather than relying on severity scores alone, effective prioritization combines internal business and asset context with external threat intelligence, then focuses teams on the fixes that reduce the most meaningful risk.

To address Claude Mythos cybersecurity risks, security teams need to adapt for a world where AI can accelerate the path from vulnerability discovery to exploitation. That means moving toward continuous exposure management, shortening the time from discovery to verified remediation, prioritizing based on real exploitability rather than severity alone, reassessing older software as new risks emerge, and making AI usage part of the organization’s broader exposure picture.

CTEM Discovery is about more than finding assets. It’s about understanding what exists, what’s actually being scanned, and how data from different tools connects. Seemplicity correlates security, inventory, identity, and ownership data across sources to create a unified view of each asset, expose coverage gaps, and give security teams the context they need to prioritize, validate, and remediate exposures effectively.

As AI accelerates vulnerability discovery and exploitation, exposure management can’t stop at visibility and prioritization. Gartner’s post-Mythos outlook points toward more preemptive, autonomous security, and Seemplicity’s Response Options puts that into practice by giving teams multiple context-aware ways to reduce risk quickly, safely, and without waiting for the full fix.

When a vulnerability is urgent but the full fix isn’t immediately safe to deploy, security teams need another way to reduce risk fast. Seemplicity’s Response Options uses AI to identify and rank multiple ways to neutralize a threat – including patches, configuration changes, compensating controls, and network-level mitigations — based on risk reduction, effort, and operational impact.