Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Phishing isn’t just increasing. It’s outpacing the way many organizations test for it. Attacks have surged 400% year over year, and corporate users are now more likely to be targeted by phishing than by malware. As social engineering becomes a primary entry point into enterprise environments, how you assess phishing risk matters just as much as how often you train for it.

Our increasing dependence on the internet and, specifically, email for business and personal communication has produced the perfect environment for cybercriminals to launch phishing attacks. As organization’s technical controls have advanced, cybercriminals have evolved their attacks, making them more difficult for traditional email security solutions that use signature-based detection (such as Microsoft and secure email gateways (SEGs) to detect.

Sending a work email to the wrong person – it’s something all of us have done at least once in our working lives. For some people, it’s a regular occurrence. But just how risky is it? Thinking back over your recent emails, you can probably pick out the ones that would have been worse to misdirect than others. In the best case it’s a non-issue or only slightly embarrassing.

For legal organizations, the integrity of communication isn't just a business requirement, it’s a foundational pillar of the profession. Whether it’s a sensitive case strategy, a confidential merger agreement, or personal client data, the information contained within firm emails represents an immense amount of trust and significant liability. However, as law firms increasingly migrate to cloud environments like Microsoft 365, they face a double-edged sword.

By the end of 2026, over 90% of all credential compromise attacks are estimated to be enabled by modular Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) kits like the sophisticated, global threat, Kratos. This aggressive platform has already begun reshaping the threat landscape. At its core, Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) is a malicious cloud-based service that allows easier deployment of phishing attacks and faster updating of features as compared to traditional phishing and malware attacks.

A friend posted this on Facebook and it came up on my feed. I know this person and I was so sorry to read. How horrific! I had no idea who was killed in the accident, so I clicked on the news story. It took me to a site that posted this: This is a real reCAPTCHA posted to filter out anti-malware and content filtering services. When I saw this I knew that this was a fake news story and that my friend’s Facebook account had been taken over by a scammer.

Researchers at Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) warn that nation-state threat actors have adopted Gemini and other AI tools as essential components of their operations. The threat actors are using tools to conduct research and reconnaissance, target victims, and rapidly create phishing lures.

Google Threat Intelligence Group recently released its latest report, “GTIG AI Threat Tracker: Distillation, Experimentation, and (Continued) Integration of AI for Adversarial Us,” on how malicious adversaries are using AI to commit cybercrimes.

Threat actors are using phony meeting invites for Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and other video conferencing applications to trick users into installing remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools, according to researchers at Netskope. The invites lead to convincingly spoofed landing pages for fake video meetings, complete with a list of coworkers who have supposedly already joined the call. The page instructs the user to install a software update in order to join the video meeting.

Social engineering remains the most reliable way into an organization—and attackers are getting better at it every day. According to the 2025 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, up to 68% of breaches involve social engineering. AI has only widened the gap. More than 95% of cybersecurity professionals say AI-generated phishing is harder to detect, and Microsoft reports that AI-generated phishing emails are 4.5x more successful than manually created ones.