In the early days of cybersecurity, implementing a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system was akin to constructing a house from scratch. The SIEM was a blank slate, and transforming raw data into actionable insights was a long and arduous journey. It began with the daunting task of ingesting data from various disparate sources and formats. From there, security teams had to craft detections — rules designed to identify malicious or suspicious activity.

The cybersecurity landscape is rapidly evolving, and nowhere is this more evident than in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) market. This period of transformation, marked by strategic mergers and high-stakes buyouts, signals not only a race for market dominance, but also the potential for profound changes in how cybersecurity solutions will operate in the future.

In a typical security operations center (SOC), the threat detection and response teams have one key objective: identify and stop the bad guys. To do so, they invest in the best tools, recruit the best team members, and work tirelessly to stay ahead of any potential security incidents that might be on the horizon.

Welcome back. This is part two of our blog series covering the Impacket example tools. Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing tools to understand and manipulate low-level network protocols. This capability enables you to craft or decode packets of a wide variety of protocols such as IP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, and even higher-level protocols like SMB, MSRPC, NetBIOS, and others.

Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing tools to understand and manipulate low-level network protocols. This capability enables you to craft or decode packets of a wide variety of protocols such as IP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, and even higher-level protocols like SMB, MSRPC, NetBIOS, and others.

Threat hunting is a massive commitment of time, resources, team members, and technology. Any investment that impactful would normally be one that was carefully measured to ensure it was driving sufficient value for the team. The thing is, there’s no established benchmark of “success” in threat hunting.

Ask any security leader and they’ll tell you actionable threat intelligence is the cornerstone of a successful, threat-informed security operations center (SOC). However, to be of any real value to the team, threat intelligence needs to be relevant, timely, and supportive of next steps for the teams that utilize it.

CVE-2023-46214 is identified as a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability within Splunk Enterprise, as reported in the Splunk security advisory SVD-2023-1104 on November 16, 2023. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability would give an attacker code execution on the target server. This can lead to exfiltration of sensitive information, persistence, lateral movement, destruction or impairment of the server, or many other malicious activities.

SOC leaders who got their start in security 10 or 20 years ago have witnessed an incredible evolution of cyber attacks. Those who have failed to keep up find themselves operating in an unrecognizable sea of advanced adversaries. All kinds of organizations across every industry are struggling to maintain their pace on the rapid timeline that threat actors have set for them.