Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Configuration Rot: Why Security Tools Quietly Stop Working

Security tools don’t usually break. They just slowly stop doing what you think they’re doing. Or perhaps were never set up to do what you needed in the first place. Something got deployed. It worked. Then it drifted. No one noticed. And three years later, you’re questioning the renewal because you’re not even sure what it’s protecting anymore. That’s configuration rot. Thanks to Julian Lee at eChannelNews for the fun, thoughtful and much needed conversation on this topic and more.

Solving the Hard Problems in Cybersecurity

We really enjoyed our conversation with Ed Amoroso from TAG Infosphere. We didn’t start Reach to chase headlines. We started it because the hard security problems weren’t getting solved. The important ones rarely are. Security only works when incentives are aligned to the customer’s actual outcome. Not noise. Not theater. Not (exclusively) shiny tools. That alignment is what makes the work worth doing.

Reach Security Announces Breakout Year Marked by Major Growth, Market Momentum, and Expanded Leadership Team

Reach Security announces a standout year of growth and innovation in 2025, and enters 2026 with significant momentum. The company's enhanced leadership team and growing customer base mean Reach is well-positioned to advance its next phase of market-leading innovation in pre-emptive cybersecurity.

IT Giveth, Security Taketh: The Hidden Cost of Configuration Drift

“IT giveth. Security taketh.” A topic examined in a print interview with Colt Blackmore, co-founder & CTO of Reach Security, written by Dan Raywood at Security Boulevard: ︎ The long-standing friction between IT enablement and security restriction︎ Configuration drift as the quiet divergence between intended and actual state︎ How incremental change accumulates into measurable risk︎ The challenge of maintaining alignment in complex, fast-moving environments︎ Why drift often remains invisible until consequences surface.

Compensating Controls: The Unsung Heroes of Cyber Resilience

Article updated and refreshed February 3rd, 2026. When ideal controls aren’t possible, intentional alternatives help reduce exposure. Most security teams know what the “right” controls look like on paper.But real-world environments rarely match the blueprint. Between legacy systems,limited staffing, and overlapping tools, the gap between what’s ideal and what’s feasible is often wide. That’s where compensating controls come in. They aren’t shortcuts.

Security Control Management: The New Mandate for Risk-Driven Security

Article updated and refreshed February 3rd, 2026. Because the tools you’ve deployed aren’t the same as the ones you’re using. Security teams today aren’t short on tools. Most environments are packed with security controls—spanning email, identity, network, endpoint, and cloud. But despite this abundance, risk remains stubbornly high. Attacks continue to land. Exposure persists. The problem isn’t the absence of controls. It’s the lack of control over the controls.

API-Based Zero Trust Assessment: Measuring Your Security Posture in Minutes

Zero Trust (and probably many general posture) conversations stall at one question: Where are we actually today? Because Reach connects directly through APIs, teams can quickly assess their environment without deploying new agents or ripping anything out. That makes it practical to benchmark a Zero Trust program against the CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model — and see what’s real vs. assumed.