Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Japan’s Ministry of Finance reports that AI adoption in large local enterprises has surged to 89%. Companies are progressively choosing to incorporate AI agents into their workflows, building with Microsoft Copilot Studio, ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude, and a myriad of other platforms, all living across a variety of environments with autonomy, privilege, and minimal supervision.

Ask AI to Choose a prompt Write a TLDR of this post Explain the security risk Summarize what CISOs should know Your team just hired someone who never sleeps, reads everything, and takes work from whoever asks. That’s the elevator pitch for Claude Tag, and on the face of it, it’s hard to see why anyone would push back on the new hire. Enterprises will want this in every workspace.

Most of the industry discourse on agentic AI risk has settled into a comfortable framing: agents get attacked the way models get attacked, through some form of prompt manipulation, and the fix is a better guardrail. I think that framing is dangerously incomplete, and I want to walk through five specific scenarios that make the case directly rather than abstractly. Two of them are manipulation. One exploits trust between agents rather than any single agent's behavior.

Zenity Labs is publicly launching AI Total: a free service that runs an AI agent skill in a sandbox and tells you what it actually did, before you let it near your agents.