Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

What separates a calm security team from one that's scrambling during a zero-day? Daniel dos Santos discusses the importance of asset visibility, network reachability, pre-approved controls, and response playbooks when responding to emerging threats.

Defenders have gained early access to powerful AI tools, creating an opportunity to improve security outcomes and strengthen cyber resilience. But as these capabilities become more widely available, that advantage may not last. Rik Ferguson, VP of Security Intelligence at Forescout, shares his perspective on what security teams should be doing now to prepare.

Most security programs were built for a slower clock. But as AI-assisted and autonomous attackers accelerate the pace of attacks, manual approval gates can become the point where defenders fall behind. This short video explores why security teams need to reexamine the processes, decision points, and response workflows that may slow them down when speed matters most.

The window between vulnerability disclosure and exploitation is shrinking. As exploit development accelerates, organizations can no longer afford to wait for a vulnerability to be disclosed or a patch to become available before taking action. Daniel dos Santos, VP of Research, explains why effective zero-day response depends on preparation that happens before an incident occurs.

In this conversation, Forescout CEO Barry Mainz will be joined by Karsten Abata, tech evangelist at Forescout, former cybersecurity practitioner, and co-author of The Control Gap, to discuss how to close the Control Gap: the widening space between seeing cyber risk and having the ability to control it before it becomes operational impact.